John Chidley A blog about reading, writing, pop culture and sports.


Former pros should be allowed in varsity sports

Mike Danton, formerly of the St. Louis Blues, is drawing attention to CIS eligibility rules as he joins the St. Mary's University Huskies starting this Thursday.

The Globe and Mail’s Roy MacGregor wrote an article Tuesday morning about former NHLer Mike Danton joining the St. Mary’s Huskies in which he criticized Canadian Interuniversity Sport for having eligibility loopholes that will allow the former professional to play for a university team.

MacGregor is a fantastic writer, and his heart is in the right place, but I humbly disagree. Having former professional athletes playing varsity sports does no damage to the sport, whatsoever.

For those of you not familiar with Danton’s sad tale, the CBC’s Fifth Estate has a very detailed timeline of his personal and professional life that includes links to interviews and news stories. Further, Hockey Night in Canada’s Elliotte Friedman has an excellent article on his one interaction with Danton and his agent David Frost.

In short, Danton is a 29-year-old former professional hockey player who was convicted of a murder-for-hire plot. Now released from prison, he is enrolling at St. Mary’s in Halifax to complete the degree he started while incarcerated and is going to play hockey in the CIS.

MacGregor is all for giving Danton a second chance at life, but does not think he should be allowed to play hockey with university students.

 “The notion of a still-growing high school graduate challenging a mature man with three years of NHL hockey to his credit is simply preposterous,” says MacGregor.

Only, really, it’s not that dangerous. Teenagers and adults can easily play full-contact sports without any risk of injury.

After all, how old was Luke Schenn when he joined the Toronto Maple Leafs last year? What about Steve Yzerman when he became a Detroit Red Wing? Sidney Crosby? Wayne Gretzky joined the World Hockey Association because they let him play before he turned 18.

Although Danton will undoubtedly play some teenagers, most starting players on CIS hockey teams will be in their early-to-mid 20s, just like the NHL.

 “As for ‘professionalism,’ the rules are mild – one year of eligibility lost for every year of pro – which still leaves Danton with two years eligibility for university hockey,” says MacGregor.

I have some hands-on experience with eligibility as the former Director of Communications for the Canadian University Field Lacrosse Association, and have dealt with issues like this.

CUFLA is an independent league that has 12 member teams from Ontario and Quebec. The league’s eligibility rules line up those of the CIS, including allowing active professional athletes from the National Lacrosse League to join teams.

What’s the logic? Simple. CUFLA plays field lacrosse, while the NLL is indoor lacrosse. Although many of the skill sets are the same, the field of play is completely different, much of the equipment is different and many of the rules are different.

The pro lacrosse players that end up on these teams act as role models that improve the level of play on the team and often serve as leaders during games and in the locker room.

What kind of effect Danton has on his Huskies teammates is anyone’s guess. Honestly, Danton is not in a position to serve as a positive example to the young players at St. Mary’s, but he could have some useful advice for them or at the very least serve as a cautionary tale.

Danton will probably be one of the best players on his team, if not all of CIS, but that doesn’t mean he should be banned from playing.

His inclusion on the St. Mary’s Huskies is not going to start a flood of NHLers joining collegiate teams. Teams are not going to be able to load their teams with ringers because there are rules that restrict scholarships as well as academic standards that guarantee the purity of the varsity game.

Frankly, today’s professional athletes have so much earning power that there is not much a university or college could offer them except tuition incentives. And really, if you could potentially earn millions per year, is a few thousand a year and mandatory class that exciting? I doubt it.

The only other player to downgrade from the NHL to CIS was Jared Aulin. Ever heard of him? No? That’s because his impact was minimal. University hockey survived that experience just fine, and I am sure that it will continue to thrive with Mike Danton playing a couple of years of hockey.

Comments (7) Trackbacks (0)
  1. It is remarkable, rather useful phrase

  2. Matchless theme, it is very interesting to me :)

  3. The writer of has written a superior article. I got your point and there is nothing to argue about. It is like the following universal truth that you can not disagree with: Bell-bottoms and Disco are Man’s greatest failure I will be back.

  4. Interesting analogy with University Field Lacrosse. And not at all correct.
    The impact of Pro players on the University game has been profound. One only has to look to Brock and the early to late 90’s, when they consistently had “ringer” talent from the pro, major, and junior ranks of box – they dominated the league – sadly, they most likely led the league in register-and-drop players. Players who had no intention of getting a University education, and who dropped their course (yes, a single half-course) as soon as lacrosse season ended. I wouldn’t be surprised if their course fees were covered by the lacrosse programme, or the fees refunded in full when they dropped out (Most Unis only refund a partial fee, unless there are extenuating circumstances).
    Having played in Oufla and Cufla in those early years, as well as Senior Field, I’ve seen register-and-drop shenanigans within a few programmes in Ontario – almost all Brock teams had fantastic student talent, but the addition of ringers (who never had any intention of obtaining a University education), tarnishes many of their Baggataway Cups.
    Even at my own school, we had a few pro drafted players each year – each one of them that I knew finished got their undergraduate and graduate degrees while playing. In 6 years, only one player dropped out, and that was a player who did a full year (having a kid changed his focus to working).
    As for pros – I’m a firm believer that unless you’ve signed up for a full course load, and are registered in a multi-year programme, you shouldn’t be playing at the University level. University is for student-athletes, not athletes who take a year of Teacher’s College or a part-time MBA (paid for by their workplace), and who do virtually nothing to help grow the Field game at the University level.
    Sure, I would love to play if I went back to do an MBA, but having played at a much higher level, it would be like playing against Bantam players – players whose only reason for registering at Univ is simply to play lacrosse and win a championship, and the coaches/teams/administration that allows it, are a cancer within the University sports.
    Let’s put some honour and pride into the game.
    And get rid of the cancers that rot it at ll levels.

  5. хотел посоветоваться с уважаемой публикой! меня интересует все статьи данной направленности. есть у кого?

Leave a comment

No trackbacks yet.