<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>John Chidley Hill.com &#187; gold medal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johnchidleyhill.com/?feed=rss2&#038;tag=gold-medal" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johnchidleyhill.com</link>
	<description>A blog about reading, writing, pop culture and sports.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:48:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Canada/USA has made me into a fan of women&#8217;s hockey</title>
		<link>http://johnchidleyhill.com/?p=251</link>
		<comments>http://johnchidleyhill.com/?p=251#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 19:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Chidley-Hill]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gold medal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hockey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Team Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Team USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women's hockey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johnchidleyhill.com/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am embarrassed to admit that last night was the first time I have ever watched a women’s hockey game from start to finish. A terrible sin, I know. I had seen periods from games or seen bits and pieces, but for a host of reasons I’ve never been able to sit and watch a [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://johnchidleyhill.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/women.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-252" title="women" src="http://johnchidleyhill.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/women-300x176.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="176" /></a>I am embarrassed to admit that last night was the first time I have ever watched a women’s hockey game from start to finish. A terrible sin, I know.</p>
<p>I had seen periods from games or seen bits and pieces, but for a host of reasons I’ve never been able to sit and watch a women’s game to completion. But I’m glad I finally did.</p>
<p>It was the perfect game to watch as <a href="http://www.ctvolympics.ca/hockey/news/newsid=52231.html#canadas+women+third+straight+hockey+gold+medal">Canada held on to an early 2-0 lead to down their arch-rivals from the United States and win their third consecutive Olympic gold medal</a>.</p>
<p>There was a lot to like about the match-up. As the prohibitive favourites in any international tournament, the North American teams had often locked up at the highest levels of competition, whether at the Olympics or World Championships. As a result, the two teams are very familiar with each other’s tactics and strategies.</p>
<p>It quickly became apparent that women’s hockey has a style all its own thanks largely to the prohibition of body checking.</p>
<p>Personally, I’ve always thought this was a sexist rule that implied that women were too fragile to withstand physical play. It just made no sense – why could a woman not safely hit another woman? They would be physical equals, with no particular danger of injury.</p>
<p>However, the lack of big hits means that the scourge of entertaining hockey – the Trap – is impossible. The resulting game is fast and free-flowing with few stops in play. It’s refreshing compared to the National Hockey League where clogging the neutral zone has often been the fastest way to the playoffs.</p>
<p>The players on both teams were exceptional passers and play makers. Throughout the game there were creative tape-to-tape passes generating scoring chances. The Canadians in particular had a knack for finding each other on the ice.</p>
<p>When they had those openings, the Canadians were patient, waiting for defenders to over-commit themselves to a blocked shot. Canada often exploited their opponents’ mistake with a sharp pass for another quality chance. It was inspiring hockey.</p>
<p>Team Canada was also impressively dedicated to defence, dropping to their knees to block shots and passes, fending off a 5-on-3 power play for nearly a minute and a half at the start of the second period.</p>
<p>It was a lot of fun to watch, with both teams evenly matched.</p>
<p>That said, I don’t regret missing any of their other games. They were all lopsided blowouts that made me feel bad for the have-nots in women’s hockey. This is the sport’s greatest weakness – only a Canada-USA match-up showcases the very best of the game. Every other pairing is horribly one-sided.</p>
<p>When the next world championship rolls around, I’ll make sure to watch – as long as the game has Canada and the USA in it.</p>
<p><strong>A side note:</strong> The fact that <a href="http://bit.ly/c45Jz7">Team Canada had to apologize for their celebratory drinks and cigars on the ice</a> is utter nonsense. The arena had emptied out and they were revelling in their success in what should have been a private moment. They should be allowed to let their hair down, guilt free.</p>
<p>I won’t go on any further, as too much ink has already been spilled over this story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://johnchidleyhill.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=251</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
